Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!botter!ark!maart
From: maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Reply: priorities of = and == revisited
Message-ID: <1175@ark.cs.vu.nl>
Date: 19 Jan 88 20:10:14 GMT
Reply-To: maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath)
Organization: VU Informatica, Amsterdam
Lines: 12

First of all, thanks to Amos Shapir, Thomas Truscott, James E. Prior and
possible other (future) respondents, for their replies.
Allright, maybe I was a bit hasty in putting aside the 'backward compatibility'
argument. Further, it's generally good to give assignment low priority, I
guess. But on the other hand, as Tom Truscott mentioned, "C converted from
x =OP y to x OP= y without too much hassle", so why not enhancing the
language further ?
Perhaps it's the time for ... *D*, the language with all the goodies of C !
Cheers.
-- 
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies |Maarten Litmaath @ Free U Amsterdam:
like an orange.      (seen elsewhere) |maart@cs.vu.nl, mcvax!botter!ark!maart