Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!lll-tis!lll-lcc!gp
From: gp@lll-lcc.aRpA (George Pavel)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: the FastPath dilemma
Message-ID: <1422@lll-lcc.aRpA>
Date: 6 Jan 88 17:01:14 GMT
References: <3881@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, Livermore Ca
Lines: 15

> The only major problem I have with the combined gateway is that it
> evidently does not respond to ARPs for hosts on its subnet (sort of
> like promiscuous ARP), as does the KIP gateway.  Since all of our
> -- 
> Clayton M. Elwell

The combined gateway code we use (Ethertalk 1.2 I believe) does respond
to ARPs on the Ethernet side for hosts on the Localtalk side.  I seem to
recall that this was true for some older versions of the code as well.

George Pavel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808  L-68				(was gp@lll-lcc.arpa)
Livermore, CA 94550			Internet: gp@lll-lcc.llnl.gov
(415)422-4262				UUCP: ihnp4!lll-lcc!gp