Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!A.ISI.EDU!CERF From: CERF@A.ISI.EDU Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: [The Mailer Daemon : Message of 9-Jan-88 ...] Message-ID: <[A.ISI.EDU]17-Jan-88.19:32:30.CERF> Date: 18 Jan 88 00:32:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 51 Sigh - second attempt. -v Begin forwarded message Date: Sat 9 Jan 88 10:48:39-EST From: The Mailer Daemon To: CERF@A.ISI.EDU Subject: Message of 9-Jan-88 10:48:29 Message failed for the following: tcp-ip@venera.isi.edu.#Internet: 550 ... User unknown ------------ Date: 9 Jan 1988 10:48-EST Sender: CERF@A.ISI.EDU Subject: SIGCOMM From: CERF@A.ISI.EDU To: tcp-ip@VENERA.ISI.EDU Message-ID: <[A.ISI.EDU] 9-Jan-88 10:48:27.CERF> With apologies to those of you who are not SIGCOMM members (you should be!!), I am using this distribution list to clarify a statement I made in the most recent Computer Communications Review (the quarterly publication of ACM/SIGCOMM). In that issue, I described a debate in which it was proposed, I thought, to drop "conferences with papers" from the ACM/SIGCOMM activities and to concentrate on focused workshops. In fact, I misunderstood Dave Clark's suggestion. He was merely pointing out that we should have only one such "paperful" conference sponsored by SIGCOMM - other activities ought to be workshop in format. Jose Garcia-Luna from SRI International also pointed out his objections to dropping all conference activity from SIGCOMM - and hastened to remind me that we have such a conference scheduled in October 88 (SIGCOMM 88 at Stanford University). So, having been "reset" by two people whose opinions I certainly respect, I intend to pursue the single, high-quality SIGCOMM conference approach and to retain Datacomm in its workshop form. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have go go charter a boat in Bimini... Vint ------- -------------------- End forwarded message