Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!ORVILLE.NAS.NASA.GOV!lekash From: lekash@ORVILLE.NAS.NASA.GOV (John Lekashman) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Hop problem Message-ID: <8801211713.AA27595@orville.nas.nasa.gov> Date: 21 Jan 88 17:13:37 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 30 From tcp-ip-RELAY@SRI-NIC.ARPA Thu Jan 21 00:40:29 1988 Received: Thu, 21 Jan 88 00:40:26 PST by orville.nas.nasa.gov (5.54/1.2) Received: Thu, 21 Jan 88 00:41:41 PST by ames-nas.arpa (5.51/1.2) Message-Id: <8801210841.AA12538@ames-nas.arpa> Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU by SRI-NIC.ARPA with TCP; Wed 20 Jan 88 14:17:55-PST Received: from UNMB.BITNET by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU ; Wed, 20 Jan 88 17:17:52 EST Date: Wed, 20 Jan 88 15:16 MDT From: Subject: Hop problem To: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa X-Original-To: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa Status: RO Can anyone tell me the status of thw work being done to get around the limitation of TCP/IP to a hop of 15 nodes? Thanks. Said work is complete, in that the current limit is 255, assuming all intervening gateways only decrement the time to live by one. This has always been the state. Perhaps the particular IP you are running initializes the time to live at 15, assuming this to be an upper limit. There is also the existence of an implementation of a routing protocol called RIP, which assumes a distance of 16 is infinite. Perhaps this is causing you some problem. All you need do is correct all machines to initialize the ttl field to be more than 15, and you will win. I doubt seriously if anyone is trying actively to repair this as a default case. john