Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!interlan!backman
From: backman@interlan.UUCP (Larry Backman)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Versus WANG, ARCNET/NOVELL Netware, & Honeywell
Message-ID: <525@interlan.UUCP>
Date: 28 Jan 88 13:21:47 GMT
References: <316966.880127.PAP4@AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: backman@interlan.UUCP (Larry Backman)
Organization: MICOM-Interlan, Boxborough, MA (1-800-LAN-TALK)
Lines: 15

In article <316966.880127.PAP4@AI.AI.MIT.EDU> PAP4@AI.AI.MIT.EDU ("Philip A. Prindeville") writes:
>The TCP is on the server, not on the client.  The server merely presents
>it as resource accessible via IPX.  Because the TCP never really exists on
>the client, it can't be called co-resident.

[]

	Philip, Please get your ts correct.  TCP is on a coprocessor
	resident within the server.  It is advertised to workstations via
	Novell's Service Advertising Protocol (SAP).  It is accessable via
	NETBIOS rather than IPX.


						Larry Backman
						Micom - Interlan