Xref: utzoo comp.sources.d:1696 comp.unix.xenix:1328
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mtune!codas!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Error in Smail patches for Xenix
Message-ID: <148@ateng.UUCP>
Date: 9 Jan 88 22:03:13 GMT
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 31
Keywords: Xenix smail

Brandon Allbery recently posted a set of my patches to smail for use under
Xenix.  Those patches are an improvement over the earlier ones that I had
posted to alt.sources and comp.unix.xenix.

Unfortunately -- mea culpa -- the patches have a small bug.

In defs.h, SMARTMAILER should be automatically defined if either SENDMAIL
or EXECMAIL is defined.  You should put something like this near the end
of defs.h:

	/*
	 * Define SMARTMAILER if execmail or sendmail
	 * is used for local mail.
	 */
	#ifdef SENDMAIL
	#define SMARTMAILER
	#endif

	#ifdef EXECMAIL
	#define SMARTMAILER
	#endif

The bug introduced by SMARTMAILER being undefined is irritating but
harmless: any mail that bounces will be returned _twice_ to the original
sender.

To paraphrase Douglas Adams, "We Apologize For The Inconvenience."
-- 
Chip Salzenberg                 UUCP: "{codas,uunet}!ateng!chip"
A T Engineering                 My employer's opinions are a trade secret.
    "Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't."  -- me