Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!marlin!aburto From: aburto@marlin.NOSC.MIL (Alfred A. Aburto) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Still More 68020 Questions Message-ID: <1022@marlin.NOSC.MIL> Date: 25 Jan 88 21:08:25 GMT References: <8801081459.AA16543@decwrl.dec.com> <3129@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: aburto@marlin.nosc.mil.UUCP (Alfred A. Aburto) Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego Lines: 52 -------------- I recently posted some floating-point test results which can be used to compare the performance of the CSA Turbo-Amiga with 16-bit memory to the Amiga with 16-bit memory. All the Turbo-Amiga 7.16 MHz results which I posted were run with 16-bit memory. The 14.32 MHz results were all with 32-bit memory. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Some comparisons (68020 Cache was ON, Software Floating-Point, 7.16 MHz Clock Speed, 16-bit memory): CPU Floating-Point Ops Per Sec Lattice C V3.03 68000 1.1 Lattice C V3.03 68020 2.5 Lattice C V4.0 68000 5.2 Lattice C V4.0 68020 5.7 Manx Aztec C V3.4B (mx.lib) 68000 2.3 Manx Aztec C V3.4B (mx.lib) 68020 4.4 Absoft Fortran 77 V2.2C 68000 3.2 Absoft Fortran 77 V2.2C 68020 6.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some more comparisons (68020 Cache was ON, Software Floating-Point, 14.32 MHz Clock Speed, 32-bit memory): CPU Floating-Point Ops per Sec Lattice C V3.03 68020 4.7 Lattice C V4.0 68020 15.3 Manx Aztec C V3.4B (mx.lib) 68020 8.7 Absoft Fortran 77 V2.2C 68020 12.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sun 3/160 Result (68020 Cache was ON, Software Floating-Point, 16.67 MHz Clock Speed, 32-bit memory): Sun f77 Release 3.4 68020 14.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems to me the Amiga with 68020 and 16 or 32 bit memory performs fairly well and it compares favorably with other similar systems. Of course 32-bit memory is preferred (and the 68881). Al Aburto