Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!lachac
From: lachac@topaz.rutgers.edu (Gerard Lachac)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Choosing an Amiga C Compiler
Message-ID: <17420@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: 17 Jan 88 15:04:55 GMT
References: <945@aluxp.UUCP>
Reply-To: lachac@topaz.rutgers.edu (Gerard Lachac)
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 18
Keywords: Lattice, Manx, others?

In article <945@aluxp.UUCP> mjw@aluxp.UUCP (Michael Weber) writes:
>    Lattice  claims  that  they  have  the   official   sanction   of
>    Commodore-Amiga  while  Manx  describes  a  superior  programming
>    environment.

If I am not mistaken, Commodore no longer endorses ANY 'C' compiler as
the official Amiga C compiler.  That distinction was dropped a while back
(but it was Lattice).





-- 
		"Truth is false and logic lost..."
					- Neil Peart
	(who at the time didn't realize he was talking about RU)
lachac@topaz.rutgers.edu <--------OR--------> {seismo|ames}!rutgers!topaz!lachac