Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!mtune!bakerst!kathy
From: kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att
Message-ID: <1039@bakerst.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jan 88 00:00:56 GMT
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP> <144800006@occrsh.ATT.COM> <76@sialis.mn.org> <1925@netsys.UUCP> <2650@pbhyf.UUCP>
Reply-To: kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent)
Organization: AT&T, Winston-Salem, NC
Lines: 23

In article <2650@pbhyf.UUCP> tlh@pbhyf.UUCP (Lee Hounshell) writes:
>In article <1925@netsys.UUCP> len@netsys.UUCP (Len Rose,NetSys) writes:
>->In article <76@sialis.mn.org> rjg@sialis.mn.org (Robert J. Granvin) writes:
>->>How about we solve this problem once and for all,
>->
>->>(Obvious sarcasm terminated).  :-)
>->
>-> You stand self condemned."Obviously".
>
>Hey!  Lighten up, huh?
>I thought the observation was pretty funny.

Agreed.  And I thought the *first* observation Robert made was also
accurate, even if he was being funny.  Different people read comp.sys.att
to read about different combinations of machines.  I'm looking for info
about 3B2s, 3B1s, 6300s, and 6300+s.  And I don't mind a bit picking up
a bit of extra information about other machines - because sometimes it
comes in handy.  If the arbitron info (159 msgs/month) is accurate, that
does seem a bit low to warrant a split - I mean, the mac groups have
that many messages passing through in a DAY  :-)

Kathy Vincent ------> Home: {ihnp4|mtune|codas|ptsfa}!bakerst!kathy
              ------> AT&T: {ihnp4|mtune|burl}!wrcola!kathy