Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:2121 news.groups:2219 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!rti!ethos!gary From: gary@ethos.UUCP (Gary J. Smith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,news.groups Subject: Re: unix-pc.* newsgroups Message-ID: <1598@ethos.UUCP> Date: 19 Jan 88 22:30:38 GMT References: <3764@islenet.UUCP> <164@flatline.UUCP> <3788@islenet.UUCP> Reply-To: gary@ethos.UUCP (Gary J. Smith) Organization: Humanities Forum at ethos, Gray, TN Lines: 36 In article <3788@islenet.UUCP> richard@islenet.UUCP (Richard Foulk) writes: >After getting a large enough number of favorable responses from the >net in support of such a move, one or more news admins could add a >line like the following to their /usr/lib/news/aliases file: > >unix-pc.general comp.sys.att Please think long and hard before doing this. Remember that a large number of 3B1s on the unix-pc net are not on usenet. You will be essentially shutting out the average 3B1 owner from the net, you will be placing the discussion under the control of the netgods who probably have never even heard of a 3B1, and you will be doing something that will be increasingly difficult to UNdo should it turn out to be a bad idea. I still do not understand the benefit of unix-pc being swallowed by comp.sys.att. Can't anyone who is interested in the 3B1 hook into the unix-pc net? Yes. Is anyone being forced to read it that doesn't want to? No. The only advantage I can see is that it might be cheaper to you and me -- the costs of transmitting the net would be transferred onto the already over-burdened backs of the backbone sites, who continue to complain more and more everyday about runaway net-volume. When examined closely, I think that is more of a disadvantage than an advantage. Until I hear an argument to convince me otherwise, ethos will continue to receive and transmit articles in the unix-pc net separate from comp.sys.att. There always IS the option of cross-posting, by the way. -- Gary J. Smith, M.D. {mcnc,ihnp4}!ethos!gary P.O. Box 8005, Gray, Tenn. 37615