Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!schuster
From: schuster@dasys1.UUCP (Michael Schuster)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: DRIVPARM and MS-DOS 3.30
Summary: Which is wrong? Manual or DOS?
Keywords: CONFIG.SYS DRIVE PARAMETER BLOCK DOS 3.3
Message-ID: <2731@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: 27 Jan 88 01:04:40 GMT
Reply-To: schuster@dasys1.UUCP (Michael Schuster)
Organization: The Big Electric Cat; New York, N.Y. USA
Lines: 14


If this subject has been covered recently, my apologies:

The MS-DOS 3.30 manual describes the use of the DRIVPARM specifier as with
DOS 3.2 (and as many know, this also worked - undocumented - with PC-DOS 3.2x).
I have been unable to get DOS to recignize a DRIVPARM entry in CONFIG.SYS
("Invalid Entry in CONFIG.SYS file"). Which is wrong in this regard - the
manual, or DOS? If the latter, is a patch coming?


-- 
l\  /l'   _  Mike Schuster          {sun!hoptoad,cmcl2!phri}!dasys1!schuster
l \/ lll/(_  Big Electric Cat       schuster@dasys1.UUCP
l    lll\(_  New York, NY USA       DELPHI,GEnie:MSCHUSTER  CIS:70346,1745