Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:10831 news.groups:2199 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!ufcsv!ukma!gatech!rayssd!gmp From: gmp@rayssd.RAY.COM (Gregory M. Paris) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,news.groups Subject: Re: Splitting comp.sys.mac Summary: Chuq must be desperate. Message-ID: <1764@rayssd.RAY.COM> Date: 17 Jan 88 01:35:05 GMT References: <3102@phri.UUCP> <6546@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <38691@sun.uucp> <8765@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> <38967@sun.uucp> Sender: gmp@rayssd.RAY.COM (Gregory M. Paris @ Raytheon Company, Portsmouth RI) Reply-To: gmp@rayssd.RAY.COM (Gregory M. Paris) Organization: Raytheon Company, Portsmouth RI Lines: 17 In article <38967@sun.uucp> chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: > it's running about 60-70K a week, which is pretty good. They gave > net.wobegon a group and it was lucky to hit 50 messages a year. This is probably the silliest example I've seen used in a while. I guess that Chuq forgot that net.wobegon was created, what, some five years ago. Really a relevant point. The net was much smaller, the number of existing newsgroups was much smaller, and the number of newsgroup creation rules was close to, if not equal to, zero. Should we chalk this fatuous argument up to desperation, Chuq? -- Greg Paris gmp@rayssd.ray.com {cbosgd,decuac,gatech,ihnp4,uiucdcs}!rayssd!gmp Is our geological destiny to be a thin black line in a cliff, which will tell some future eye, "This was when man lived... and died?"