Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:13593 comp.sys.misc:1040 comp.sys.ibm.pc:11042 comp.sys.mac:11568 comp.sys.atari.st:7126 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!umd5!purdue!gatech!psuvax1!vu-vlsi!swatsun!garth From: garth@swatsun.uucp (Garth Snyder) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Software (and other kinds of) copying Message-ID: <1532@carthage.UUCP> Date: 22 Jan 88 21:45:11 GMT References: <8055@g.ms.uky.edu> <174@piring.cwi.nl> Reply-To: garth@carthage.UUCP (Garth Snyder) Organization: Swarthmore College, Swarthmore PA Lines: 42 Keywords: technology changes things > In article <174@piring.cwi.nl jack@cwi.nl (Jack Jansen) writes: > Ok, I'll come up with something original. The problem is capitalism. Well, no, not really. People own their labor and their time, and within reason they can use these assets however they wish, whether it's writing software, growing wheat, or just goofing off. This is not a 'problem' but a kind of basic human right. You might just as well say that the 'problem' is the failure of software to just magically appear from nowhere without anyone having to do any work. People want money back in return for their efforts, and aren't satisfied with fame or esteem or whatever else. Now, that is reasonable if you make 'hardware': a knife is a knife even if you don't want to share it. But, it doesn't work for ideas. If I write a beautiful song, but I don't sing it (or, preferrably, let others sing it) in public, I might as well not have written it in the first place. It's value is in publication. The same is true for books, philosophies, ideas and (to a certain extent) software. There is little difference between hardware and software as far as their reason for existence is concerned. A knife is simply a tool; there is not much you can do with it unless you have something you want to slice up. Likewise, a word processor does you no good unless you have something to write. Your word processor might be so well designed that it reminds you of a beautiful, harmonious song, but its quality doesn't alter the fact that it is simply a word processor. A finely crafted and perfectly balanced piece of kitchen cutlery is still a knife. Your conclusion that something's publication is necessary for it to be valuable is just simply wrong. A diamond is valuable even before it is mined; a house can be a warm and stimulating environment even if no one but the owners ever enter it. Suppose that I write a very specialized program and sell it to a few specific businesses whose needs it fits completely. Is it then valueless? -------------------- Garth Snyder UUCP: {seismo!bpa,rutgers!liberty}!swatsun!garth Swarthmore College ARPA: garth@boulder.colorado.edu Swarthmore, PA 19081 ALSO: {hao,nbires}!boulder!garth --------------------