Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!amdahl!oliveb!sun!msf@amelia.nas.nasa.gov From: msf@amelia.nas.nasa.gov (Michael S. Fischbein) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Yuppie software Message-ID: <39738@sun.uucp> Date: 22 Jan 88 20:42:15 GMT Sender: news@sun.uucp Distribution: comp Lines: 34 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com >desktop publishing: Yuppie-ism at its finest. Extravagant, ostentatious, >conspicuous and expensive, desktop publishing clearly demonstrates that >personal computing has reached boutique status. Of course, TeX, LaTeX, their distributions; *roff and their distributions have enabled the capability of desktop publishing for years. All that has happened is that it has gotten easier, so there are fewer excuses for sloppy, hard to read copy. -- Michael Fischbein msf@ames-nas.arpa ...!seismo!decuac!csmunix!icase!msf These are my opinions and not necessarily official views of any organization. [moderator's kibbitz: While TeX has been available, it hasn't been available on machines that the average user might have available -- the packages that blazed the trail onto the Mac's and the PC's opened up a market that TeX simply hadn't addressed. Also, TeX is (1) not even remotely WYSIWYG (much as I hate that overused acronym) and has a pretty hefty learning curve. The advantages of PageMaker or Ready Set Go is that you can make them useful quickly -- if faced with TeX, my belief is that most users other layout packages wouldn't. Even if they aren't WYSIWYG in practice, they're close enough that it helps people who haven't spent lots of time with the program visualize the output. With TeX, you have to know enough about Tex to mentally visualize the output (or run it through a previewer constantly, which is a royal hassle] ---------------------------------------- Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop-request Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun