Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!noao!arizona!lm
From: lm@arizona.edu (Larry McVoy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: C shell script files
Message-ID: <3516@megaron.arizona.edu>
Date: 21 Jan 88 04:04:17 GMT
References: <11333@brl-adm.ARPA>
Reply-To: lm@megaron.arizona.edu.UUCP (Larry McVoy)
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson
Lines: 14

In article <11333@brl-adm.ARPA> milgr@brandeis.csnet (Marc Milgram) writes:
>Subject: C shell script files
>I have written shell scripts in both sh and csh.  Currently, I can
>write scripts faster in the csh because I use most of the features of
>the csh every day, and I almost never use sh.

Remember this when you start suggesting that csh is the way to go: 

    A sh(1) script is portable to every unix box out there.  
    Csh scripts are not.

-- 
Larry McVoy	lm@arizona.edu or ...!{uwvax,sun}!arizona.edu!lm
		Use the force - read the source.