Xref: utzoo news.groups:2166 comp.ai:1201 comp.cog-eng:381 sci.lang:1752 sci.bio:770 sci.math.stat:237 sci.med:3718 sci.misc:698 sci.research:295 talk.philosophy.misc:817 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!umd5!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!todd From: todd@uhccux.UUCP (The Perplexed Wiz) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.ai,comp.cog-eng,sci.lang,sci.bio,sci.math.stat,sci.med,sci.misc,sci.research,talk.philosophy.misc Subject: Re: time for sci.psych??? Keywords: psychology newsgroup Message-ID: <1426@uhccux.UUCP> Date: 11 Jan 88 06:42:49 GMT References: <1416@uhccux.UUCP> <1820@epimass.EPI.COM> Reply-To: todd@uhccux.UUCP (The Perplexed Wiz) Organization: U. of Hawaii, Manoa (Honolulu) Lines: 23 In article <1820@epimass.EPI.COM> jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) writes: >In article <1416@uhccux.UUCP> todd@uhccux.UUCP (The Perplexed Wiz) writes: >Before you start collecting votes, wouldn't it make more sense and >acheive your purposes if the existing sci.psychology were changed >from an inet group to a "world" group? Seems pointly to contruct >some kind of a gateway between two groups with similar names. > >- Joe Buck {uunet,ucbvax,sun,decwrl,}!epimass.epi.com!jbuck > Old internet mailers: jbuck%epimass.epi.com@uunet.uu.net What you suggest is a good idea. However, I think the same result will be achieved no matter which path I take. If sci.psych does not get enough votes for creation, there is not much of an argument to ask for the INET sci.psychology articles to be gatewayed to USENET. On the other hand, if there are enough votes to justify the creation of a USENET sci.psych group, there there is also enough justification to ask for sci.psychology to be gatewayed in....todd -- Todd Ogasawara, U. of Hawaii Faculty Development Program UUCP: {ihnp4,uunet,ucbvax,dcdwest}!sdcsvax!nosc!uhccux!todd ARPA: uhccux!todd@nosc.MIL BITNET: todd@uhccux INTERNET: todd@uhccux.UHCC.HAWAII.EDU