Xref: utzoo rec.ham-radio:3713 sci.electronics:1952 misc.legal:3521
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!amdahl!oliveb!gnome
From: gnome@oliveb.olivetti.com (Gary)
Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Re: Does the ECPA have teeth yet ?
Message-ID: <13293@oliveb.olivetti.com>
Date: 20 Jan 88 08:00:52 GMT
References: <675@fai.UUCP>
 > Xref: oliveb rec.ham-radio:3942 sci.electronics:2186 misc.legal:4426
 >>	If anybody out there knows of specific court cases it would very
 >>valuable if they could post that information to the net - as many questions
 >>remain about what
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, CA
Lines: 9

It was obvious from the start that the ECPA was designed to do two things.

1) Give cellular phone sales people a warm, cozy feeling and
2) Enable the FCC/federal government to use the law for selective
   enforcement.
Not to mention that it now makes it easier to designate more areas
"hear no evil" zones that you can be arrested for listenning to...

Gary