Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!markh
From: markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Black Holes II
Message-ID: <4157@uwmcsd1.UUCP>
Date: 11 Jan 88 18:37:25 GMT
References: <2480@dasys1.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@uwmcsd1.UUCP
Reply-To: markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Lines: 12
Keywords: Black Holes and other topological warps in space-time
Summary: General Relativistic Engineering

In article <2480@dasys1.UUCP> gf@dasys1.UUCP (G Fitch) writes:
>------
>Since my last posting, I have read (mail or news) about a dozen 
>wildly divergent reasons for believing in black holes.  A few 
>were cogent and have caused me to _partially_ revise my opinion.

Perhaaps we can settle this issue once and for all by developing the technology
to engineer strong gravitational fields, create our own black holes in the 
garage, as it were.
     The only thing I fear is that if we do this, it we could send a wrench intoit, and it would remain eternally stuck near the event horizon ... all while
it emerges out of another white hole in the primate section of the Milwaukee 
Zoo.  You could say that this might put the wrench into a monkey.