Xref: utzoo news.groups:2309 comp.cog-eng:405 comp.ai:1249 sci.misc:768 sci.research:311 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!tektronix!sequent!mntgfx!msellers From: msellers@mntgfx.mentor.com (Mike Sellers) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.cog-eng,comp.ai,sci.misc,sci.research Subject: Another vote for comp.cog-sci (was Re: time for sci.psych???) Message-ID: <1988Jan18.190755.220@mntgfx.mentor.com> Date: 19 Jan 88 03:07:50 GMT References: <1416@uhccux.UUCP> <4215@utai.UUCP> Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation, Beaverton Oregon Lines: 28 Keywords: Cognitive Science newsgroup In article <4215@utai.UUCP>, tjhorton@utai.UUCP (Timothy J. Horton) writes: > I'm hoping, eventually, for a sci.cognitive or comp.cog.sci somewhere, > somewhen, somehow. Apparently, a lot of people were upset about misuse of > comp.cog-eng, since it's supposed to be about cognitive factors engineering, > (ie. human factors topics), but people have continued to "misuse" it again. > Considering the kinds of material mentioned, should such a newsgroup have > "cognitive" somewhere in the title? (ie. "cog")] > > A separate vote for sci.cog-sci? > > Timothy J Horton (416) 979-3109 tjhorton@ai.toronto.edu (CSnet,UUCP,Bitnet) Yes, definitely. This subject is gaining in popularity, though many of the sub-groups of people involved (computer scientists, psychologists, neurologists, anthropologists, linguists, etc.) only know their area and don't seem to know much about what the others are doing or thinking. This field is in such a state of flux that it is difficult to keep up with much of what is going on. A forum for discussion of issues, ideas, theories, questions, research, and happenings related to Cognitive Science would be a welcome and useful addition to the net (sorry, I can't moderate a group or list, however :-7 ). Any other votes? -- Mike Sellers ...!tektronix!sequent!mntgfx!msellers Mentor Graphics Corp., Electronic Packaging and Analysis Division "The goal of AI is to take the meaningful and make it meaningless." -- An AI prof, referring to LISP