Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!pioneer!eugene
From: eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene N. Miya)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: comp.parallel
Summary: comp.arch.parallel?
Message-ID: <4569@ames.arpa>
Date: 8 Feb 88 17:07:43 GMT
References: <22983@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>
Sender: usenet@ames.arpa
Reply-To: eugene@pioneer.UUCP (Eugene N. Miya)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
Lines: 15


 I have no qualms reading comp.hypercube.  I would not be averse to
seeing a comp.arch.parallel.  But, this is spliting hairs (sometimes you
have to; I'm a reductionist after all ;-).  I think a greater
problem are those who cross-reference comp.arch when they post to
comp.unix* because "it's part of `architecture'."  There's lots of
interesting stuff in arch (enough tho' I'm reading 64-bit micros for the
4th time ;-).

From the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:

--eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@ames-aurora.ARPA
  "You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?"
  "Send mail, avoid follow-ups.  If enough, I'll summarize."
  {uunet,hplabs,hao,ihnp4,decwrl,allegra,tektronix}!ames!aurora!eugene