Xref: utzoo comp.cog-eng:448 news.groups:2433
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nbires!hao!woods
From: woods@hao.ucar.edu (Greg Woods)
Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng,news.groups
Subject: Re: Choice between sci.psych and sci.cog-sci
Message-ID: <1143@hao.ucar.edu>
Date: 2 Feb 88 19:22:55 GMT
References: <4235@utai.UUCP> <1507@uhccux.UUCP>
Reply-To: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods)
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 11

In article <1507@uhccux.UUCP> todd@uhccux.UUCP (The Perplexed Wiz) writes:
>FYI: The vote for SCI.PSYCH currently stands at 90 YES/1 NO.  I think that
>while it does not strictly hold to the "100 more YEA than NAY" rule, there
>is enough interest to request that the group be created. 

   I would oppose such a move. What good is having the rules if we don't
even follow them? We have to apply the rules consistently to ALL new group
requests, or they become worse than useless. 100 votes out of all the thousands
of net readers is not a lot to ask for.

--Greg