Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!mordor!sri-spam!rutgers!ucla-cs!trainor
From: trainor@CS.UCLA.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Computer Animations
Message-ID: <11043@shemp.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 3 Feb 88 05:10:28 GMT
References: <957@luth.luth.se> <5790@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: root@CS.UCLA.EDU
Reply-To: trainor@CS.UCLA.EDU (Vulture of Light)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 11
Keywords: graphics companies, money, etc.

slim@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Slim Whitman) writes:
>
>As well as I can tell, the primary reason Cranston Csuri went out of business 
>was that they were top heavy ( too much management ).  The number of people 
>actually doing animation or software production was about half of the actual
>employees of the company.

Ditto on the top heavy for Omnibus, as a former member of Omnibus 
Computer Graphics...  Omnibus gets my vote for the ballsiest power
play though -- right near the end, whew!

	douglas