Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!ur-tut!sunybcs!boulder!hao!noao!arizona!naucse!jdc From: jdc@naucse.UUCP (John Campbell) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: = vs ==, and do 10 i = 1.3 Message-ID: <546@naucse.UUCP> Date: 28 Jan 88 00:12:37 GMT References: <8971@ccicpg.UUCP> <887@micomvax.UUCP> <567@tuvie> Organization: Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Lines: 17 Keywords: C, lint, checking Summary: Better Lints? Who's Gimpel? In article <567@tuvie>, rcvie@tuvie (ELIN Forsch.z.) writes: > In article <887@micomvax.UUCP> ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes: > >... > >Indentation is IGNORED by Lint and the compiler, ... > >... > > Perhaps you try a better lint! We use Gimpel's ... Ok! Hold it! Can someone summarize all available lint's? I thought there was a pcc based lint that some netters have been passing mods around for and a few commercial lints and that was it. Has lint been collecting unnoticed? Especially, who is writing gnulint (anybody)? -- John Campbell ...!arizona!naucse!jdc unix? Sure send me a dozen, all different colors.