Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!pardo
From: pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The D Programming Language (was: Still more new operators)
Message-ID: <4183@june.cs.washington.edu>
Date: 8 Feb 88 01:29:47 GMT
References: <11702@brl-adm.ARPA>
Reply-To: pardo@uw-june.UUCP (David Keppel)
Organization: U of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle
Lines: 21

In article <11702@brl-adm.ARPA> dsill@NSWC-OAS.arpa (Dave Sill) writes:
>but it could be D (it *should* be D, not P (pee?)).
>
>Maybe we should start a new newsgroup/mailing-list for the discussion
>of such things.  It seems like a lot of the current discussion here is
>about things that will never make it into ANSI C such as a power
>operator, `noalias' :-) et cetera.  Sure would improve the S/N ratio
>for those interested only in C.

Sounds good to me.

I've been collecting interesting ideas about ``D'' off the net for a while.
If y'all would like to send me your 1 or two favorite "improvements" to
C to be incorporated in "D", I'll send you a summary in response.

Not that I intend to write D or P or whatever, but if somebody wants my
ideas (take my ideas, please!)

	;-D on  (Creativity is ... hard to define)  Pardo

	pardo@cs.washington.edu		..!ucbvax!uw-beaver!uw-june!pardo