Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!ags
From: ags@j.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: IMAG generic FORTRAN 77 function
Message-ID: <6397@j.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 10 Feb 88 14:28:12 GMT
References: <8802092150.AA14785@jade.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: ags@j.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Dave Seaman)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 13

In article <8802092150.AA14785@jade.berkeley.edu> AER7101@TECHNION.BITNET (Zvika Bar-Deroma) writes:
>Hello,
>Could anyone tell me if the usage of IMAG as a generic name (for AIMAG)
>is according to ANSI 77 or is it some vendors' extension.

There is no generic name corresponding to the specific name AIMAG in the
standard.  The point of having generic names is to allow an intrinsic to
apply to more than one data type, but that isn't possible with AIMAG.  The
argument type can only be COMPLEX.

-- 
Dave Seaman	  					
ags@j.cc.purdue.edu