Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!gmwi1!marque!gryphon!greg
From: greg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Greg Laskin)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Return Receipt
Message-ID: <2434@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Date: 6 Feb 88 01:23:08 GMT
References: <4890@pyr.gatech.EDU> <1512@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> <237@icus.UUCP> <2396@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Reply-To: greg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Greg Laskin)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 31
Summary: Ooops -- mea culpa

In article <2396@gryphon.CTS.COM> greg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Greg Laskin) writes:
>In article <237@icus.UUCP> lenny@icus.UUCP (Lenny Tropiano) writes:
>>In article <1512@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> taylor@hplabs.HP.COM (Dave Taylor) writes:
>>|>Ken Hall asks:
>>|>> Is there any way to turn on return receipt in ELM?
>>|>The nickle and dime way would be to add 
>>|>	Return-Receipt-Requested:
>>|>(or whatever the header is) to your ~/.elmheaders file . . . but
>>
>>This is good only if your mailer understands the header 
>>"Return-Receipt-Requested: lenny@icus.UUCP"  But smail2.5 doesn't.  I
>>assume sendmail does?   Does elm understand this syntax and automatically
>>send a return receipt?  Or is this in a later version.  I am running 1.7 beta.
>>
>I believe the correct header line is:
>
>Return-receipt-to: person@site
>
>Smail 2.5 spits out receipts if it see one like that (at least here it does.)

Return-recipt-to: triggers a return receipt here but it's not coming from
smail.  Its coming from the local version of /bin/mail.

I'm so embarased, I may never post anything again.

-- 
Greg Laskin           
"When everybody's talking and nobody's listening, how can we decide?"
INTERNET:     Greg.Laskin@gryphon.CTS.COM
UUCP:         ihnp4!scgvaxd!cadovax!gryphon!greg rutgers!marque!gryphon!greg 
                        codas!ddsw1!gryphon!greg