Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!think!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!crash!pnet01!haitex From: haitex@pnet01.cts.com (Wade Bickel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Dongle blues (software prices) Message-ID: <2446@crash.cts.com> Date: 29 Jan 88 13:56:13 GMT Sender: news@crash.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA Lines: 43 chanst@atrium.UUCP (Steve T Chan) writes: >Todd is right. There are too many middle man and distributors involved, >and of course they all wanted their share of profit, which makes software >prices so high, if the companies would (I doubt it) distribute their own >software directly to our friendly neighborhood dealer, I am sure that >software prices will be down drastically, since the author of the program Perhaps. But consider the following. 1) Each distributor removes part of the work load from publishers and such. Without the distributor the publisher must hire additional people. 50 publishers all need, say, one extra person, as opposed to a handful of employees at the distrib- torship. 2) Distributors bear risk when they buy product as well. 3) Distributor's tie up capital in software, and must be compenstated for this at a level beyond that attainable through alternative available investments. 4) If the distributor's could be cut out they would be. In most markets they provide a service that is useful. 5) If the distributor's were getting fat, more distributors would appear and competition would solve this. Finally I have a question. What rate of return on investment for each party concerned do you (anybody) think is fair? Consider the Author, Publisher, Distributor and Retailer. Thanks, Wade. UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!haitex ARPA: crash!pnet01!haitex@nosc.mil INET: haitex@pnet01.CTS.COM