Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!oliveb!sun!pepper!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A bug in Lattice 4.0
Message-ID: <41879@sun.uucp>
Date: 14 Feb 88 00:25:08 GMT
References: <1070@pembina.UUCP> <648@applix.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 21

In article <648@applix.UUCP> scott@applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden) writes:
>The problem is more simply demonstrated:
>    char *foo = "test";

Wonder what it does if you use :
	char	foo[] = "test";

It has always bothered me that foo[] and *foo were not very orthogonal under
Lattice, don't know how Manx deals with this stuff.

> Also, am I the only one who finds that Lattice consistently generates
> programs sensitive to phantom ^C aborts?  I mean, I execute a Lattice
> program, and the "User Abort" requester appears.

I have not seen this at all, maybe something is stomping on your signal
data? 


--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.