Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!SPHINX.UCHICAGO.EDU!god3
From: god3@SPHINX.UCHICAGO.EDU (Peter Godwin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: PC Transporter
Message-ID: <8801231953.AA29434@sphinx.uchicago.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 88 19:53:41 GMT
References: <880122-123820-1750@Xerox>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16


A PC Transporter is more attractive than a clone because:

1.  All current peripherals will work with the PC Transporter in IBM mode.
   (No need to buy new modem, hard drive, clock, etc.)

2.  For myself in particular, I move alot (I'm a student) and by
having to move only one machine, instead of two is better.

3.  PC clones are not the most reliable machines in the world.  PC Transporter
is made by a very supportive and reliable company.  A US company so 
problems can be resolved much quicker.

      Peter Godwin             |   UUCP   ...ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!god3
  5335 S. Kimbark Ave., #2     | Bitnet   god3@sphinx.uchicago
  Chicago, Illinois  60615     |          
  Home Phone: 312-288-1816     | The University of Chicago Computation Center