Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:11395 comp.unix.questions:5439 comp.sys.att:2383
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!gatech!hao!noao!mcdsun!sunburn!gtx!al
From: al@gtx.com (0732)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
Message-ID: <556@gtx.com>
Date: 2 Feb 88 15:04:28 GMT
References: <246@mancol.UUCP>
Reply-To: al@gtx.UUCP (Al Filipski 839-0732)
Organization: GTX Corporation, Phoenix
Lines: 18
Keywords: tar,cpio,archivers

In article <246@mancol.UUCP> samperi@mancol.UUCP (Dominick Samperi) writes:
>
>I'd be interested to hear about any published standards for tar and/or
>cpio (AT&T, POSIX, etc.), especially standards that define how to deal
>with multi-volume archives (e.g., how do you start reading starting at
>volume N?). Perhaps people can add to the list of advantages/disadvantages

I too would like to know if such information is available.  I once did
a cpio backup onto multiple floppies (AT&T 3B1), and when I tried to
restore,  I had a hard read error on one of the floppies, early on in
the sequence.  Luckily, I had the information elsewhere.  Would there
have been any way to bypass the bad floppy and continue the restore?
Where can one get a document describing cpio format?


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   | Alan Filipski, GTX Corp, 2501 W. Dunlap, Phoenix, Arizona 85021, USA |
   | {ihnp4,cbosgd,decvax,hplabs,amdahl}!sun!sunburn!gtx!al (602)870-1696 |
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------