Xref: utzoo comp.sys.dec:511 comp.org.decus:222 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!beadel From: beadel@oswego.UUCP (Edward F. Beadel Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.org.decus Subject: Re: More RSX questions Keywords: RSX, C, multiprocessors Message-ID: <644@oswego.UUCP> Date: 12 Feb 88 01:25:22 GMT References: <9780@udenva.cair.du.edu> Reply-To: beadel@oswego.UUCP (Edward F. Beadel Jr.) Distribution: na Organization: Instructional Computing Center, SUNY at Oswego, Oswego, NY Lines: 108 In article <9780@udenva.cair.du.edu> news@udenva.cair.du.edu (netnews) writes: >Well, I have received an encouraging response to my inquiry into whether >there is sufficient interest in PDPs to have a special newsgroup. In addition good! >some DEC people are asking for this as evidence to their management to prove >that DEC needs to get agressive again in the PDP market. Therefore I am asking Hummmm .... Which DEC people? If it's people in MSD, then their management knows that there is interest. The DECUS PDP-11 Working Group has been meeting with the top guns in MSD, *but* we (the PDP-11 Working Group) NEED YOUR SUPPORT! Please keep following your oun leads, but I ask that you also keep the members of the WG informed of the "good, the bad, and the ugly". What we need is information, case histories, war stories, etc. to make our case, and be listened to by MSD and the V.P.'s of DEC. Please include Ed Cetron (Chairman of the DECUS PDP-11 Working Group) in your mailings. His Internet address is: cetron@cs.utah.edu If you want to include me fine, I'll forward it to Ed. My address is a bit of a mess right, and I'm only reachable by UUCP at: ....!rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!beadel NYSERNet says that we should be back on the Internet by Monday evening 15-FEB-88. When we are back on line my address will be: beadel@oswego.oswego.edu >that anyone who wishes to see a PDP newsgroup send me email stating that fact. From my commentary above you can take that as a yes. I will be mailing you my YES vote. For other readers, look at the proceedures for forming a new newsgroup in news.admin (I think). Basically, someone has to anounce the desire to form a news group. (There {is | are} special newsgroup{s} that one should use plus it dosn't hurt to use existing groups that are closely related to the proposed group). The person *POSTING* the notice has to collect the mail vote for one month, tabulate it, and forward the results to the netnews "keepers-of-the-order" at one of the backbone sites. (Names and addresses listed in the article in news.admin). It takes 100 more "yes" votes than "no" votes to form a "main" group (eg. comp.sys.dec.pdp). However a "secondary" newsgroup can be formed with fewer numbers (eg. alt.sys.dec.pdp). SO MAIL IN YOUR BALLOT! > 1> Would a PDP Ada be of interest? Of what type - a run-time only >Micropower Pascal type system, a layered product, a straight cross-compiler? > You *must* have government contracts! (sorry I couldn't resist) > 2> Would you like to see development tools for VAXELN ported to the >Ultrix environment? > How does this relate to the PDP-11? There are to be no more releases (or sales) of ULTRIX-11. > 3> Should DEC resume its multiprocessor PDP project? We where told that There are some people who would like to see it, but from what we've seen it's *very* unlikely for DEC to do it. There are some third parties that have "PDP-11 clusters", "PDP-11 coupled processors", etc either in production or in the planning (dreaming) stages. >the J-11 chip has 4 (?) pins that where implemented purposely for >multiprocessing and that it would be relatively easy to put several J-11s on >one board. RSX already has multiprocessing hooks built in (for M-Plus at least). By who? Or does this come along with the story of a semi-conductor maker who has redesigned the J-11 and has gotten a 40MHz clock on it. BTW. DEC denies this story. >Imagine a parallel F77 on the PDP!!!!! > Would be interesting! > 4> DEC informed us that the KXJ-11 coprocessor board will be released >in 4-6 months. This board will contain a J-11, 512 kb local memory, 128 kb Is this for "public consumption" or were you under a DEC "nondisclosure" aggreement when you were so informed? If under the latter and you are putting this on the net, you may well have spoiled your chances of getting any other future plans out of DEC. >shared memory, 2 serial ports configurable as asyn. or sync., one 20 bit >parallel port and 3 counter-timers. The board has no bus master capability. >What else do you the user want? We suggested a 4 channel 12-bit A/D. Remember If the board is as far along in it's production schedual as you suggest, then it is highly unlikely that you will see anything else added to it. Your input *may* influence the next (if there one, or even a first), but of course what you hear "should not be construed as a commitment by DIGITAL Equipment Corporation" for anything. {:-) > This a chance to funnel user wants back to Maynard, so please send >me email with your thoughts. I will try to post a summation of DEC's responses >but remember that some of the items may be covered by non-disclosure agreements. > >The PDP is alive and well, so let's keeping pushing DEC in the right direction! >Remember that I need your responses no later then 23 Feb. AM to use them. > AND REMEMBER THAT THE DECUS PDP-11 WORKING GROUP NEEDS YOUR THOUGHTS AS WELL. So please keep the old cards and letters comming. -ed -- Edward F. Beadel, Jr., Assoc. Dir. ...rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!beadel Instructional Computing Center SOON TO BE (AGAIN???) SUNY College at Oswego beadel@oswego.oswego.edu Oswego, NY 13126 (315)-341-3055