Xref: utzoo comp.misc:1795 comp.sys.m68k:707 comp.sys.mac:11784 comp.sys.ibm.pc:11187
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!uflorida!codas!usfvax2!pdn!larry
From: larry@pdn.UUCP (Larry Swift)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: The New Chips
Message-ID: <2129@pdn.UUCP>
Date: 28 Jan 88 13:51:41 GMT
References: <4746@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1430@husc2.UUCP> <4227@utai.UUCP> <462@picuxa.UUCP>
Reply-To: larry@pdn.UUCP (0000-Larry Swift)
Organization: Paradyne Corporation, Largo, Florida
Lines: 8
Keywords: Intel IBM

In article <462@picuxa.UUCP> gp@picuxa.UUCP (Greg Pasquariello X1190) writes:
>In article <4227@utai.UUCP>, tjhorton@utai.UUCP (Timothy J. Horton) writes:
>> IBM used the 80xx stuff because they owned Intel.
>
>Where do you people come from.  IBM did _not_ own Intel.

You're both right.  IBM did not own a majority of Intel, but owned (owns?)
a significant block of Intel's stock.