Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!occrsh!occrsh.ATT.COM!mollusk From: mollusk@squid.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: FLUSHOT2.ARC Virus (Trojan) protect Message-ID: <141900014@occrsh.ATT.COM> Date: 5 Feb 88 09:57:00 GMT References: <7188@brl-smoke.ARPA> Lines: 38 Nf-ID: #R:brl-smoke.ARPA:-718800:occrsh.ATT.COM:141900014:000:1686 Nf-From: squid.UUCP!mollusk Feb 5 03:57:00 1988 From squid!mollusk Fri Feb 05 00:27 CDT 1988 remote from occrsh Subject: Re: FLUSHOT2.ARC Virus (Trojan) protection program >PLEASE! send any replies to: {ihnp4,moss,cbosgd,uokmax}!occrsh!squid!david =In article <7188@brl-smoke.ARPA> w8sdz@brl.arpa (Keith B. Petersen (WSMR|towson) => =>It was to counter just such a program that the enclosed program, =>called FLU_SHOT, was developed. = =This sounds like a really excellent idea. But this kind of program, =more than any other, deserves to have its source posted as well. =This way, people can be absolutely sure the shot is not also a virus. =Not that it is now, but someone could make one and distribute under =the same name. Is there any way the source could be made available? = = =Doug Braun Intel Corp CAD = 408 496-5939 Hear! Hear! Posting a uucoded trojan/virus to comp.sys.ibm.pc while flying false colors would be a very simple way of trashing a *LOT* of systems, and getting away with it. There is a newsgroup for binaries, where all of them are tested before they are released. And why post the binary without the source, if you wrote it yourself, and the program is pd? Aren't hackers proud of their code anymore? And while I've got your attention... The bbs in my signat has *lots* of C source, and a few binaries (and all the binaries are *tested*), including UUPC, DCP and Binkley. David Drexler ______________________________________________________________ WoofNet: 1:147/1 Usenet: {ihnp4,cbosgd,moss,uokmax}!occrsh!squid!david SneakerNet: Bethany OK USA 73008-1214 Direct: [405] 728-2463 (2.4/1.2/.3 Kbaud) A SourceCode BBS