Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!pearl
From: pearl@topaz.rutgers.edu (Starbuck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MacUser compiler comparison
Message-ID: <17669@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: 28 Jan 88 19:07:40 GMT
References: <10870@shemp.UCLA.EDU>
Reply-To: pearl@topaz.rutgers.edu (Starbuck)
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 23

In article <10870@shemp.UCLA.EDU> khayo@MATH.ucla.edu (E. Behr)) writes:
>Hi; I have a question to those who are familiar with both
>Turbo & LS Pascal compilers. In the latest MacUser I saw
>an article comparing various Mac compilers (not only Pascal).
>As an owner of TP I quickly looked at a table where points were
>assigned in several categories, and saw that TP scored pretty
>low in all, which is of course clear heresy :-) I know it's
>far from being perfect, but:
>  So, have the scores been assigned randomly, or did the editors
>use substances, or what ?              Eric
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>          >>>>--------------->         khayo@MATH.ucla.edu 

Actually, thast entire article read like an advertisement for MPW.  Sigh.
I'll take TP anyday.

Steve

NAME:  Stephen Pearl (Starbuck)        VOICE: (201)932-3465
UUCP:  rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!pearl ARPA:  pearl@topaz.rutgers.edu
US MAIL:  LPO 12749 CN 5064, New Brunswick, NJ 08903
QUOTE:  "Works for me!" -Rick Hunter (The Cop, not the Robotech Defender)
	"What is Starbuck-ing?" -Adultress 19