Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpda!hpesoc1!hpindda!atchison
From: atchison@hpindda.HP.COM (Lee Atchison)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MacUser compiler comparison
Message-ID: <6500011@hpindda.HP.COM>
Date: 29 Jan 88 17:32:40 GMT
References: <10870@shemp.UCLA.EDU>
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 18

I never read the MacUser article.  I use Turbo Pascal exclusively - I like
it, but it has some problems.  I've heard a lot of good things about
LSPascal, and am thinking of giving it a try.

My big question is this:  Which do <most> people prefer, LSP or TP?

I am mostly interested in quality of debugging environments, smallest
number of bugs, and speed of compilation - in that order.

What do people think?  Is LSP better than TP?  Should I convert to LSP?
Keep in mind that I already own TP, and would have to buy LSP......

Thanks for any help you can give me.

			-lee
----
Lee Atchison
Hewlett Packard, Information Networks Division
atchison%hpindda@hplabs.hp.com