Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!think!husc6!psuvax1!vu-vlsi!UUCP
From: mcvax!POMONA.bitnet!7GMADISO@vu-vlsi.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandy
Subject: Re: T4000 ('386) vs. Compaq DP 386/16
Message-ID: <1347@vu-vlsi.UUCP>
Date: 5 Feb 88 06:16:39 GMT
Sender: UUCP@vu-vlsi.UUCP
Lines: 27

Date: 2 February 1988, 18:00:15 PST
From: 7GMADISO at POMONA
To:   COMP-SYS-TANDY at VU-VLSI

If we're talking 16MHz Compaq vs. 16MHz T4000, the difference is minimal
from what I have heard, *IF* you have at least 2Meg of RAM in the T4000,
due to the interleaved memory addressing.  Adding the second Meg improves
the speed about 20-25%, given the benchmarks I've seen.  Of course, if you
are talking Compaq DP 386/20MHz, the Compaq will obviously be somewhat
faster.

                    ---- George Madison


--------------------
''Your logic is impeccable, Captain; we are in grave danger.''
                           -- Mr. Spock ('The Changeling')

''Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
 Inside a dog, it's too dark to read.''
                           -- Groucho Marx

''Shut off that light, Stella; I won't be looked at in this
  merciless glare!''
                           -- Donald (from 'Brothers')
--------------------
BITNET: 7gmadiso@pomona
UUCP:   psuvax1!pomona.bitnet!7gmadiso