Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!mgm.mit.edu!wolfgang
From: wolfgang@mgm.mit.edu (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: New Technologies
Message-ID: <2848@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Date: 8 Feb 88 14:13:01 GMT
References: <7944@sunybcs.UUCP> <2407@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <360@splut.UUCP> <10@ucsd.EDU>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: wolfgang@mgm.mit.edu (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Distribution: na
Organization: Freelance Software Consultant, Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 8

In article <10@ucsd.EDU> brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor) writes
about putting eproms in backwards. This reminds me of the 
old adage about all the UV that you use to erase the eprom
being released when you plug it in backwards. ;-)
---
Wolfgang Rupprecht	ARPA:  wolfgang@mgm.mit.edu (IP 18.82.0.114)
Freelance Consultant	UUCP:  mit-eddie!mgm.mit.edu!wolfgang
Boston, Ma.		VOICE: Hey_Wolfgang!_(617)_267-4365