Xref: utzoo rec.photo:1916 sci.electronics:2074 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mailrus!ames!sgi!donl From: donl@foist Newsgroups: rec.photo,sci.electronics Subject: Re: Homebuilt transmission densitometer? Summary: Transmission densitometers Message-ID: <10692@sgi.SGI.COM> Date: 9 Feb 88 23:40:08 GMT References: <2659@dcatla.UUCP> Sender: daemon@sgi.SGI.COM Distribution: na Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc, Mountain View, CA Lines: 31 In article <2659@dcatla.UUCP>, ittfb@dcatla.UUCP (Thomas F. Blakely) writes: > A handy tool around the Black & White darkroom these days is a > transmission densitometer. While relatively inexpensive ones are > available (ca. $200) it might be an interesting project to build > one. Has anyone had any experience along these lines? It should > be pretty straightforward, unless there's something I missed. I use an enlarging meter to measure density, under the enlarger light source. I either project the negative or lay it over the photocell. The meter gives linear values (a function of time and paper speed), so i take the log myself. There is an outfit (which seems to be basically one man) called Science & Mechanics Instruments or something like that, with plans for densitometers. The basic scheme is that they will sell you one of a couple of different meters, and plans for a light source, which is simply a wooden box with a bulb and brightness control, with a little stand for the meter and an arm for the probe. I agree that density measurements don't have to be very complicated, and it should be easy to build a densitometer in any of several configurations. The meter i use, which is also handy for general printing, is a Beseler i bought for about $75. It has proven itself plenty accurate and repeatable for my purposes. It's a little clumsier to use than a densitometer, because i have to multiply the ASA dial and time and then take the log, but for the money, it serves me just fine! - donl {sun,pyramid,adobe,decwrl,ucbvax,allegra,research}!sgi!donl donl@sgi.com