Xref: utzoo sci.space:4572 sci.space.shuttle:547 Path: utzoo!linus!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!ucsd!telesoft!roger From: roger@telesoft.UUCP (Roger Arnold @prodigal) Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Choice of launch sites for geosync. satalites Summary: penalty isn't THAT bad Keywords: geosynchronous transfer, plane change Message-ID: <200@telesoft.UUCP> Date: 12 Feb 88 02:16:01 GMT References: <1505@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: TeleSoft Inc., San Diego, CA Lines: 38 In article <1505@boulder.Colorado.EDU>, huntting@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Bradley Enoch Huntting) writes: > It occured to me the other day that when satalites launched from within the > U.S., they are put into a transfer orbit which is inclined about 20 deg from > the plane of the equator. This means that the net change in velocity nessary > to place the payload into geosyncronous orbit (sum of the instantainious > acceleration nessary to attain transfer orbit (~10.1 km/s) plus the > instantainious acceleration nessary to bump the object from transfer to > geosyncronous orbit (~1.45 km/s if launched from the equator, or ~4.39km/s > if launched from 20 deg latitude) is higher by ~3km/s! That's a 26% increse! > [..] Whoa! I don't know where you got that 4.39 km/sec figure, but it's way off. (Actually, I can guess: it sounds like what one might come up with by figuring the plane change first, in LEO, rather than at GEO). There is definitely a penalty for launching from higher latitudes, but it's not nearly that bad. (Figure, figure). Uhm, the back of the envelope numbers I get--taking your 10.1 km/s and 1.45 km/s as correct--is about 1.65 km/s for the appogee burn from a launch at 20 deg. That's still a significant penalty, but not unbearable. The vector diagram for the two appogee burns looks something like this (pardon my ascii): ^ |\ | \ | \ 1.45 km/s | \ 1.65 km/s | \ | \ ^ \ | 20 ^ | deg./ 1.55 km/s | / | / 1.55 km/s | / | / o - Roger Arnold ..ucsd!telesoft!roger