Xref: utzoo soc.women:9661 alt.flame:1698
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!amdahl!ames!hc!lll-winken!netsys!cucstud!c3engr!c3pe!gypsy
From: gypsy@c3pe.UUCP (the virtually invulnerable gypsyroach)
Newsgroups: soc.women,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Jerky Commercial
Summary: hoopie doopies?!?
Message-ID: <421@c3pe.UUCP>
Date: 16 Feb 88 07:41:42 GMT
References: <8522@sunybcs.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Not Really Records, Herndon, VA
Lines: 25
Destination: The Real World

In article <8522@sunybcs.UUCP>, ugeileen@sunybcs.uucp (Ma Kettle) writes:
>         ...they have women in bathing suits with the words
>         Budweiser across their chests and hoopie doopies!    

hoopie doopies?!?

what, pray tell, are hoopie doopies?  are they like hooters?  love clappers?
gazongas?  or is this some *other* part of the anatomy?  no, really, i need to
know so i'll know what to tell my roommate they are...he collects euphemisms.

hoopie doopies?
excuse me while i fall out of my chair laughing...i love it...i really love it.

by the way, i am with what you said 100%.  what confuses me is that all the men
i've ever met actually prefer women with a little more meat on their bones.  so
why is it that all the "sex symbols" are really mutant coathangers?  (i think 
they breed them...we should feel sorry for them.  obviously they are really
just laboratory-created genetic freaks, like "mansters" [see the weekly world
news from last week for an explanation].  and they may look good now, but just
think -- the larval form of coathangers is single socks.  can you imagine what
these poor women looked like as children?)  the mind boggles...

gypsy @ decuac.dec.com!c3pe

"A heavy-lidded woman, sinfully trailing the scent of moist, but dying,
 camellias."  -- Thorne Smith, from "Rain In The Doorway"