Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!mordor!sri-spam!ames!amelia!msf From: msf@amelia.nas.nasa.gov (Michael S. Fischbein) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Cray 2 has 2GW address Message-ID: <305@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> Date: 29 Feb 88 13:01:58 GMT References: <416@micropen> <3534@killer.UUCP> Reply-To: msf@amelia.nas.nasa.gov (Michael S. Fischbein) Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Lines: 33 In article <3534@killer.UUCP> elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green) writes: >in article <416@micropen>, dave@micropen (David F. Carlson) says: >[NASA dude discusses running GNU Emacs on his Cray:] > >> I know most of these CRAYs are used in DoD research on important things like >> bombs and SDI, but my running an EDITOR (ie. slow interactive process) >> on a CRAY--presumably payed for with my tax dollars. Ouch! Can't you >> find any good emacs for a VT100 on a VAX11/780 to run twenty editor jobs? > >the "Ouch" that you're talking about is the character-at-a-time task switch One problem here that no one's brought up (so I will :-)). The character at a time problem isn't the Cray-2 context switch, (though it isn't a context switching speed demon, it does do much better than a 780), but the communications channel. You don't hook a terminal to a Cray-2; you don't even hook a CSMA/CD LAN to it. You hook a fast token net (such as hyperchannel) up so those big files (400MB and up) can be transferred in a reasonable amount of time. Of course, this leaves you scrambling for those one character interactive packets. If I remember correctly (I've got the reference here somewhere, but I'm sure I'll get flamed if I'm far off -- or even just a little off), tests on the first Ames Cray-2 showed twenty SIMULATED hot-and-heavy interactive edits used about 8% of one cpu. These were all running as canned scripts. Unfortunately, they also simulated using more than half of the available "outside world" i/o bandwidth. mike -- Michael Fischbein msf@ames-nas.arpa ...!seismo!decuac!csmunix!icase!msf These are my opinions and not necessarily official views of any organization.