Xref: utzoo comp.ai:1358 comp.edu:895 comp.cog-eng:477 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!husc6!hao!gatech!mcnc!duke!crm From: crm@duke.cs.duke.edu (Charlie Martin) Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.edu,comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: Becoming CAI literate Message-ID: <11128@duke.cs.duke.edu> Date: 20 Feb 88 19:01:55 GMT References: <26@dogie.edu <3340@killer.UUCP <8194@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU Organization: Duke University CS Dept.; Durham, NC Lines: 55 Posted: Sat Feb 20 14:01:55 1988 In-reply-to: roberta@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU's message of 18 Feb 88 22:43:58 GMT Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.47.4 of Sun Aug 9 1987 on duke (berkeley-unix) In article <8194@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU roberta@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Roberta Millstein) writes: Path: duke!mcnc!uvaarpa!umd5!ames!aurora!labrea!decwrl!decvax!dartvax!eleazar!roberta From: roberta@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Roberta Millstein) Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.edu,comp.cog-eng Date: 18 Feb 88 22:43:58 GMT Article-I.D.: eleazar.8194 Posted: Thu Feb 18 17:43:58 1988 References: <26@dogie.edu <3340@killer.UUCP Reply-To: roberta@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Roberta Millstein) Organization: Dartmouth College, Hangover,NH Lines: 25 Xref: duke comp.ai:1385 comp.edu:1004 comp.cog-eng:484 In article <3316@killer.UUCP elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green) writes: Spending hours and hours improving your speed of computing numbers was worthwhile before the advent of $5 calculators. But I would much rather that our school children be taught MATHEMATICS for those multitude of hours. Sure, teach them computation skills. But don't make mere arithmetic computation the only thing taught to our students, like it is today (at least in this state... from grades 1 through 6, adding, subtraction, multiplication, and division, day after day... blech!). Is it any wonder that the majority of the students in the local "gifted and talented" program despise "math" class, calling it boring and repetitive? I was in one of those "gifted and talented" programs at that age and I too thought math class was boring and repetitive...that was because generally more drill was involved in regular classes than was necessary. That's why they *have* gifted and talented programs, to provide a more stimulating learning environment. However, that doesn't mean that some good drilling in arithmetic wasn't useful--I am a firm believer that a having a good strong base in things like mathematics makes all the difference when you have to conquer more complicated concepts, like algebra, calculus, etc. The fact that the students were bored was a function of the fact that they were in a program that was too easy for them, not that the drills were useless. For those that need the hours of drill to become proficient, however, they are very worthwhile. There exists a neurological disfunction analogous to dyslexia that makes calculation difficult: hours of drill at which the person fails over and over again does not make arithmetic skills better, but rather simply convinces the person of their lack of any mathematical talent. I think the real solution here --assuming it can be done-- is to somehow recognize individual needs and teach or train to best meet those needs. Saying, for example, calculators are good or bad in general doesn't seem to be all that helpful. -- Charlie Martin (crm@cs.duke.edu,mcnc!duke!crm)