Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!munnari!mulga!devel!ecs!bmp
From: bmp@ecs.ecs.oz (Bruce Paterson)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Unify/Accell Transaction Logging, etc.
Message-ID: <135@ecs.ecs.oz>
Date: 16 Feb 88 03:31:58 GMT
References: <6597@charlie.OZ> <683@dsacg3.UUCP> <315@fairlight.oz>
Organization: Email Electronic & Petroleum Equipment Division, Melbourne, Australia.
Lines: 20
Summary: So are we

In article <315@fairlight.oz>, gary@fairlight.oz (Gary Evesson) writes:
> 
> 	There's one of us here! We are currently running UNIFY 3.2, but will
> be going over to 4.0 as soon as someone finishes porting it for our machine. I
> would also like to here more from UNIFY users!
> 
> 						gary@fairlight.oz
> 						Gary Evesson.
OK. I have not been with this company long ( Email Elec & Petroleum Equip. Div )
, previously known as L & L, but we are extensive users of Unify. At present
we still are using Unify 3.1 D because it hasn't been worth the expense of
porting 3.2 or 4 to the discontinued Unison computer. We will soon be moving
to 3.2 or 4 when we upgrade the machine we sell with our bulk loading system.
We have many C routines, our own compressed database backup, a thorough
database checker etc. developed to overcome the many bugs in 3.1, which
would also work on later versions.

						Bruce Pateron

 (If you really want to ask about anything the best address is srw@ecs.oz)