Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Mince (Mince Is Not Complete Emacs)??
Message-ID: <9739@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: 1 Mar 88 18:02:26 GMT
References: <456@xios.XIOS.UUCP> <MW-Vd3y00WAIcTY1N8@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 18

In article <MW-Vd3y00WAIcTY1N8@andrew.cmu.edu> aad+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU ("Anthony A. Datri") writes:
| AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
| 
| Believe me, you would rather use edlin that mince.  Mince isn't an
| acronym -- it's a description of what it does to your FAT.  Use Epsilon, put
| out by Lugaru around here somewhere.

I will state without comment that I have used MINCE and it's successor
Final Word for about four years without a problem. There may have been a
problem with some version of MINCE, or MINCE in general on some machine,
but I have not seen any problem with it. The person who got me started
on MINCE still uses it.

	"reproducible results aren't"
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me