Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!ogg!girard
From: girard@ogg.cgrg.ohio-state.edu (michael girard)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: the Computer Animation show
Message-ID: <1104@ogg.cgrg.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 22 Feb 88 23:33:20 GMT
Organization: Computer Graphics Research Group, Columbus OH
Lines: 23
Summary: technology not in question?

> In article <1685@desint.UUCP> geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) writes:
> >I was sure amused by the person who alleged that computer animation won't
> >be really interesting until hardware/software advances take out the tedium.
> >(Sorry, I can't reference or quote, due to having expired the article).
> >This is precisely the attitude I was railing against.  Have you considered
> >the amount of tedium involved in *hand*-drawing 24 frames per second of
> >Snow White?  Tedium is not the problem, and technology is not the answer.
> >-- 
> Yeah, right Geoff.  I kinda smiled at that too.
> *Kids* these days...

   
   Right. Snow White was produced with little technology.
It was made by just a FEW animators on a LOW budget 
and transferred to film from  3/4" VIDEO!! (-:
   *Adults* these days...