Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "Noalias" warning and questions
Message-ID: <2721@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: 20 Feb 88 01:23:07 GMT
References: <8012@elsie.UUCP> <10055@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <7256@brl-smoke.ARPA> <10074@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT.
Lines: 18

In article <10074@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> cjc@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Chris Calabrese[rs]) writes:
|In article <7256@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
|> In article <10055@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> cjc@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Chris Calabrese[rs]) writes:
|> >... I put all kinds of #define and #if and #ifdef
|> 
|> To the extent that standardization can eliminate some of that,
|> it would be highly desirable.
|
|I agree, but for systems work this is self contradictory.

Hardly.  Eliminating *all* of it would no doubt be impossible, be Doug said
*some*.  Surely we can eliminate some of it, and is it not desirable to do so?

In any event, I see no sense in which this is "self contradictory".
-- 

Frank Adams                           ihnp4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Ashton-Tate          52 Oakland Ave North         E. Hartford, CT 06108