Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!aurora!amelia!ames!hao!gatech!purdue!umd5!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: $1 check for first person who convinces me main can't be reserved Message-ID: <7352@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: 26 Feb 88 13:46:43 GMT References: <8016@elsie.UUCP> <8020@elsie.UUCP> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 15 In article <8020@elsie.UUCP> ado@elsie.UUCP (Arthur David Olson) writes: > IMP: Main. One of our extensions makes it a keyword. > You're not allowed to use it at all. This is silly. The proposed standard makes clear what the function of main() is; a strictly conforming program shall use only those features of the language and library specified in the Standard; a conforming hosted implementation shall accept any strictly conforming program; a conforming implementations may have extensions provided they do not alter the behavior of a strictly conforming program. I don't see how anyone could misinterpret the intent of all this, unless perhaps they were focusing on just one tiny portion of the Standard and ignoring the fact that it is the entire Standard that must be conformed to, not just an isolated portion of it.