Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!nrl-cmf!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: == vs = Message-ID: <7357@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: 28 Feb 88 00:08:35 GMT References: <11216@brl-adm.ARPA> <2111@chinet.UUCP> <4403@garfield.UUCP> <2727@mmintl.UUCP> <687@l.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 11 In article <687@l.cc.purdue.edu> cik@l.cc.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes: >Telling me that what I want to do in part of my code can be done in >FORTRAN, another part in PASCAL, another part in ..., where each part >is a small number of lines, is stupid. I suppose it would be -- who is telling you to do that? >Do not restrict the programmer! C's use of = for assignment and == for comparison does not restrict the programmer.