Xref: utzoo comp.misc:1922 comp.sys.m68k:761 comp.sys.mac:12693 comp.sys.ibm.pc:11939
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ukma!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!porthos.rutgers.edu!friedman
From: friedman@porthos.rutgers.edu (Gadi )
Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Motorola policy
Message-ID: <274@porthos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 11 Feb 88 02:18:51 GMT
References: <4227@utai.UUCP> <1029@edge.UUCP> <2167@tekred.TEK.COM> <3138@phri.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 19
Keywords: Intel IBM
To: roy@phri.UUCP


In article <3138@phri.UUCP> roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) writes:

> 	Isn't that restraint of trade, and thus illegal?  Aren't you
> required by (US) law to give the same deal to all your customers, i.e. if
> you will sell 68000's to XYZ Computer Company for $N each, in 1000 piece
> lots, you must also sell them to anybody else with the same conditions,
> regardless of what they plan on doing with them?
> -- 
> Roy Smith, {allegra,cmcl2,philabs}!phri!roy

I remember a case where K-Mart sued Izod because Izod would not
sell to discount stores.  If I remember correctly, K-Mart lost.

                           Gadi
-- 


uucp:   {ames, cbosgd, harvard, moss}!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!friedman
arpa:   FRIEDMAN@ARAMIS.RUTGERS.EDU