Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!GSWD-VMS.GOULD.COM!tucker%vger
From: tucker%vger@GSWD-VMS.GOULD.COM (Tim Tucker)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP security options (again)
Message-ID: <8802211939.AA03710@vger>
Date: 21 Feb 88 19:39:41 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11

> Umm...   the  security option is *COPIED* upon fragmentation.  Or
> is supposed to be copied.  Check the documentation.  Mike

Ok, your correct.  I guess I should say that the problem with the Berkeley
code is that it doesn't fragment packets correctly containing IP options
that don't get copied to all fragments.

By the way, anyone know when the new IP security option RFC will be out?

Tim Tucker
tucker@claudius.Gould.COM